Sextant Report
Your profile
Not an installer, manufacturer, or contractor

Production assessment · 90 days

System performance record

Sample data
Shortfall worth reviewing

72%

actual ÷ modeled expected

This sample result is below the modeled range.

Recorded production was 72% of the weather-adjusted model. The uncertainty range remains below the expected range, so a qualified service review may be useful. Production data alone cannot identify the cause.

60%70%80%90%100%110%120%
Assessment range 65–80%Reference range 85–100%
Window
90 days
Recorded production · kWh
2,592.0
Modeled expected · kWh
3,600.0
Model / weather source
v0.1.0 / sample

What this result cannot see

The expected value is modeled, not measured. Tree growth and other shading changes can reduce production and are not visible to this method. Soiling and inverter clipping also add uncertainty. This report does not identify a hardware fault or its cause.

Sample comparison window: May 1–July 29, 2026, America/New_York. Irradiance source: demonstration fixture, not a live historical-weather feed. Model: weather-ratio-v0.1.0.

Optional next step

Ask a service contractor to review the record.

We may be paid by a contractor if you choose a referral and later hire them. Payment never changes this assessment. No contractor receives your information unless you consent to this specific referral.

The referral would include your production history, system specifications, equipment, service address, and what you have already tried.

Sextant Report — Independent solar production record